Sunday, August 23, 2015

I Just Can't Help myself...

“Thank you Lord Jesus for President Trump.”   I saw this held by two "Trumpsters" today on Facebook.   The logic, or lack thereof, is mindboggling.  Jesus, a spiritual individual, advocate for the poor, critic of the wealthy and God’s sacrifice to humanity has given us Donald Trump, windbag, nihilist and billionaire.  Despite this evidence, Americans as a whole are not stupid.  We have managed to maintain an effective form of government that requires the participation of its citizenry for 239 years.  We have had our difficulties, but we have usually recovered.   At least, that’s what we hope.
Just for the sake of argument, say 20% of our population is intellectually inept, stupid.   That would represent about 66 million individuals.  Even though that would leave us with 264 million with rational intelligence, that’s a lot of stupid.  Look at most of the great political movements since the American Revolution.  Most started with far less than a 20% popularity rate, the French Revolution, the Russian (Soviet) Revolution, the over-cited rise of Nazi Germany and the Mao Revolution in China all began with a determined minority that effectively manipulated a desperate populace against the existing government.  All had the benefit of a clueless ruling class that kept to itself, ignored the majority and obsessed with its opulence.  So what does this have to do with Jesus giving us Donald Trump?
After the 2008 “Great Recession”, the wealthiest 20% in this country, some 66 million folk, suffered some setbacks, but by 2012 it was back to its fat and happy debt driven ways.  Sacrifices were minimal and the government kept them, us, afloat until we got back on our feet.  All the while, everyone else struggled.  Median income dropped, real inflation continued to rise and income growth stagnated.  Most continue to suffer while those in the upper income brackets continue to represent the majority of government and pretend everything is good.    
66 million people with most of the economic might in this country represents a very powerful micro-economy.  Enough money can be exchanged among the top 20% to sustain the U.S. economy and keep people content.  What do the Tee shirts say?  “Life is Good.”  While we live in our nice houses and drink our lattes, we pretend the remaining 80% are fine.  Enter the Tea Party.
            There are a lot of pissed off people in this country.  The income inequality, the massive individual debt and general manipulative nature of our representatives helped create a movement that could be a serious threat to the well being of all.  Granted, these folks have good reason to be upset.  However, enough of the Tea Party has proven itself to be gullible to demagogues such as Donald Trump who seethes vitriol for the sake of immediate personal gain.  Immediate is an important distinction here.   There have been numerous characters fueling the angst of our citizenry since 2008, but none have tapped into our worst like “The Donald.” He says what he wants, and individuals with no sense of perspective beyond a mythological interpretation of faith and the pain of current circumstances drink it up like cold PBR. 
            The Donald will not last.  He’ll get bored and realize that the White House will threaten his business opportunities.  However, once he goes back to bullying clients and star-crossed wannabes, a leadership void could result in the rise of a manipulative sociopath who follows Trumps formula for divisive popularity while building a political following that puts he or she in power.  Most of the current Republican candidates for President are struggling in the wake of the Trump phenomenon, and their response has been to mimic the anti-liberal, anti-immigrant and anti-establishment rhetoric so attractive to the “Trumpsters.”  All have maintained distrust for the government they have so willingly served over the years as a means to portray themselves as one of us.  As insincere and hypocritical as all of this seems to most, there is a substantial population that buys the rhetoric.  
            What makes the rise of a powerful and talented populist more problematic is that he or she may not even be on the national stage yet.  One of the consequences of the Tea Party movement and its predecessors of the previous two decades is that the federal government has become a target with less and less power.  Grass roots movements have taken over local and state governments while critics of the federal government have led interference.  Pundits and their followers lambast Federal overreach in education, health care and entitlements while they act to defund these entities at the statehouse.   Fewer resources provided for local citizenry while they are convinced it is Washington’s fault.   This is not a formula for a return to responsive government. 

            We have numerous serious challenges in this country that require thoughtful leadership and discriminating, collaborative, followership.  The history of humankind tells us that such reason has a difficult time overcoming outrage driven by ignorance.   The majority of the population goes about their business, accepting the ebb and flow of life, while a determined minority finds a way to convince others, inaccurately, that there doesn’t have to be an ebb.  The entire Trump affair would make for good comedy if there were not others dangerously stoking the anger Trump is manipulating.  Failure to overcome a movement that plays on emotion over reason could lead to massive national heartache.  Somehow 266 million people need to convince 66 million that ignorance is far from bliss.

Saturday, August 1, 2015

Where is the Well?

            I have been reading the two books of Samuel the past few weeks through Forward Day by Day (prayer.forwardmovement.org).   David is a fascinating biblical character full of complex contradictions.  Perhaps that was the necessary leadership trait for greatness in ancient times.  I particularly enjoy reading about his strategic action to overtake Jerusalem. As I understand it, he discovered the way into Jerusalem through the Wadi, or well.  He took what we would probably call a commando unit up the well and overcame the force within the fortress.
            I caught myself thinking of this action metaphorically wondering who could find the well in Washington, D.C. to overcome the established, affluent, order.  Of course there are significant drawbacks to this contemporary scenario.  I’m not convinced, after reading the two Samuels, that biblical writers were sure whether David was a good guy.  God even warned the people of Israel of the drawbacks that come with a kingdom.  Yeah, David slayed a giant and he made Israel a significant player in regional politics, but he did many immoral things: think Bathsheeba.  I’m not sure a contemporary leader with David’s charisma would get the results we desire.
            In this day and age many of us want a modern day Messiah to take over and set the country straight.  We suffer from a mythology about imperial leadership that is not only undemocratic, but almost non-existent in a historical context.  The David model shows us that individuals are flawed.  The best of our history, although primed by strong leaders, was a collective effort.  One similarity to David's Jerusalem is that Washington does tend to act like a walled city.  In fact, so do many state capitols.  Influence peddlers gain access, circle up the wagons, and keep policy makers in the dark, or worse, well fed.
            Grand republican experiments have always had difficulty maintaining a democratic approach to governance because the populous often desires a benign omnipotent leader to keep them safe and prosperous.  Focusing the welfare of a country on one individual has typically ended badly.  Our republic is suffering because the public with varying political perspectives spends a great deal of time looking for one progenitor of the ideal.  The fact that such an ideal is non-existent is often forgotten due to tenuous societal circumstances.  More times than not, republics have fallen because people willingly buy the snake oil of a few.  Perhaps the most constant theme we glean from David is not his actions, but the uncertainty of Biblical reporters.  Is David a good guy? Does the over all prosperity of a Kingdom justify brutal action or indicate God’s will?  The conflict between Messianic saviors and cynical political behavior muddies the historical verdict.
            Our Constitutional legacy was started as an agreement among Men who owned property.  The result was a willingness to acknowledge differences while maintaining a status quo supported by historic governmental behavior.  Of course this, like the flawed Davidian line, led to problems and adjustments brought on by rampant hand ringing, corruption, violence and, in the best cases, respectful problem solving. Not perfect, but often promising.

            Every four years we look for a President who can bend everyone to a will formed by moral certainty of a non-existent majority.  The willfulness of government, communities and individuals keeps such power at bay (Thank Goodness).  Our only way to positive change for the greater society in a republic is to accept that the citizens must do the heavy lifting.  Finding the proverbial Wadi will not change this requirement.