Sunday, May 31, 2015

A Modest Proposal (After an Audacious One)

        Ah the flat tax…Perhaps my favorite Warner Bros. short is the one where Foghorn Leghorn’s principal antagonists, the Chicken Hawk and the “Dawg,” lure him into a peep show with “hulee. hulee dancers” whereupon he is pummeled to oblivion.  In this upcoming election cycle, conservative republicans play the role of dawg and hawk with the enticement of a flat tax while working and middle class Americans once again stick their heads into the tent.   As I recall, I don’t have time to check for historical accuracy, Dick Army, right wing sweetheart, introduced a flat tax bill to great fanfare in the 1980s.  Later, 1994, Newt Gingrich promoted the flat tax as a tenet in the “Contract with America” that solidified the conservative hold on contemporary American politics.   Since that time, every election season includes a flat tax proposal from a conservative candidate.  Republicans have held congress 17 of the last 21 years and the flat tax has never even gotten to a vote.   
Contrary to the hope of simpletons, the flat tax will never happen.  Here’s why: Too many people benefit financially under the current tax structure.   Plus, the wealthier you, or your company, are the more you benefit.  Corporate welfare is real and it starts with the income tax.  Given this reality, here is a tax proposal of liberal and libertarian foundation:
Taxes have always been a tool used to manipulate the governed.  This is not limited to American history.  Whether republic, monarchy, autocratic or communist, taxes are levied by the powerful to get specific behaviors from the citizenry.   Sell more houses give a tax break on mortgages, decrease smoking increase the cigarette tax, encourage children by giving a deduction on dependents, etcetera, etcetera… I propose that as a democratic republic we turn this on its head.   First, let’s start with a progressive flat tax that starts at, say, 30% for the wealthiest.   Then, here’s the kicker, develop a list of government services that the taxpayer can select for his or her contributions:  A cafeteria plan as it were.  Add to this a percentage allocation option for the services chosen.   Finally, write into this tax law a privacy stipulation that says that only the individual taxpayer can know what he or she selected. 
Talk about government by the governed.   Due to the wild variety of opinions that exist in this country, I’m not sure our bureaucratic priorities would change that much.  However, wouldn’t it be nice to see representatives and government bureaucratic budgets beholden to the public?   Being the good liberal that I am I would choose education, health care, social security, food stamps, infrastructure, law enforcement and reluctantly, defense (We do need it you know).   There are many who would select other options, but I’m ok with that.

Now I know this idea would never happen so here is plan “B”:  Raise the minimum wage to a living wage for 40 hour employees.  Forget all of the tax manipulation.   Consumption, not the illness, represents about 70% of our economy.  Whenever our economy goes into a slump, no matter how steep, government revenues drop.   This obviously happens because income and spending decrease.  Pay people for their work and you just might see revenue for the things we need.

Let's Talk

I think I would prefer conversation…Either that or this maddening digital age has taken any semblance of disciplined discernment out of my being.  I have ideas, I actually like to explore them with others and refine my misconceptions.   I have discovered that I enjoy this aspect of Facebook, but few are willing, have the time or are suffering from this malady I now describe.  
            Our new challenge as human beings is to regain some semblance of discipline with the hyper access of social media.   When our communication options began to explode around 2000.  I discovered that I couldn’t keep up with voice mail and email.  I then declared to anyone with whom I worked that email is the best way to get in touch with me.   I continue to stick with this mantra and find that most compliment my communication.   Since that time we have added Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram etc., and I still tell people to put it in an email.  I was recently told by my boss to text because that is the best way to get her response.  I try.
            At some point we are going to have to come to a collective understanding about the impact all of these communication protocol have on our productivity.  Many dismiss this as “Boomer Ranting,” but we need to understand that boomers still have a profound collective impact on our government, culture and society.  This has to be acknowledged and served.
            I have ideas.  I want to contribute for the rest of my life.   I need to be heard.  However, I can’t seem to keep up with the almost daily change in interaction protocol.   I’m not sure “Xers”, Millenials or  any other generational iteration does any better.   My peers tend to post pictures of young people sucked into their phones astounded by the abhorrent behavior, while the young simply laugh at our scorn.

            There is evidence that some have caught on.  Some corporations have set policy about appropriate time on emails.  Leadership consultants have begun to tell us that it is ok to limit access.  I just want to sit down with people and share ideas.  Over a beer of course…