I recently attended a Principals’
seminar where the keynote speaker stated that educators are not the problem
with public education, parents are. I
often cringe when I hear this from those who advocate for public
education. It is an easy ploy that casts
blame over acting to serve. This
position also demonstrates the social divide that now threatens the public
schools brought on by institutional indifference.
I have 5 siblings of which I am the
fifth. I was born 5 years after the
fourth child and 14 years after the oldest.
The four older siblings would often grumble that my little sister and I
did not have the same parents. My father
had a very patriarchal perspective and the older four would often share
experiences that showed my parents to be strict disciplinarians. By the time the last of us came along, my Mom
was in her late thirties and my Dad his forties. By the time I began to explore in many of the
inappropriate ways of a child, Mom and Dad had taken on the philosophy of “but
for the grace of God.” My siblings and I,
all college graduates, have all led successful lives by American standards, but
it took tremendous effort, worry and expense on the part of my parents to help
us get there. They had to adapt to each
of us and find ways to help us see the value of character, perseverance and
humility. The end result was similar,
but each journey has been different.
My Mom was among the wisest people
I have had the pleasure to know. She was
a “war bride” and had her first child at the age of 20. She deftly navigated through the energy and
personality of all six of us without benefit of an owner’s manual. She came from a strong family with great
parents of her own, but her daily experience was her greatest teacher. By the time I was in high school my Mom was
very well known for her public school advocacy.
She would later brag that she had participated in PTAs for 28 years; a
daunting accomplishment. My little
sister and I grew up in the South at the offset of busing for integration and
my mother threw all of her energy into supporting the public schools. My little sister was bused to an inner city
school. This had a profound impact on my
mother who frequently volunteered to serve breakfast for the underprivileged
children in this school. She began to
witness the difficulty of parenting on the impoverished and how unprepared
young teenagers were to be mothers. She
understood that these families did not have the parenting legacy she had and
how difficult that was on poor working class families. Mom, as regional
president of the PTA, began to use her position to advocate for parenting
classes to the local school board.
Perhaps Mom’s greatest trait, empathy, gave her insight into the impact
parenting deficits had on cyclical poverty.
What alarmed her even more was the disdain the educational institutions
demonstrated toward families.
Regretfully her advocacy fell on deaf ears.
Perhaps the
two most humbling experiences I continue to have are that of the teacher and
parent. As a young teacher I learned
that reaching children does not result from bending students to your will, but
meeting them where they are. This means
that I had to fully embrace my role as a servant if I was to convince students
that what I teach is important. It took
me about five years to internalize this practice. I have learned through the years that this may
be the single most important attribute of successful teachers. The teachers most desired by parents
understand the importance of the parent toward the success of the child. This does not mean that these teachers cater
to the whims of parents, but they successfully employ parents as partners. I have seen both strict, structured, teachers
and more sensitive teachers succeed because they embrace the humanity of the
parent.
My understanding of the family
dynamic did not begin to form until I became a father. As single teacher I often judged parents of
my students prior to becoming a parent myself.
The parent model that raised me did not automatically instill empathy
toward parents. When I heard more
experienced teachers lament the contemporary state of parenting I simply took
this as the reality faced by schools. Once
I encountered the challenges of family life my perspective evolved. I began to
better understand the challenges that influenced parental decisions. As a principal, I see young teachers too
quick to judge the impertinence of students as a product of poor parenting. They don’t understand the stressors that
homework or extra-curricular activities place on family continuity or
routine.
It astounds
me that educators come across as so judgmental toward parents. When a child does not complete homework, or
assignments, some believe it is because
there is not enough discipline in the home.
A child is frequently tardy to school, the parent obviously doesn’t
value education. The institutional
response to these problems has been to enforce more restrictions and
rules. The public schools frequently take
a “no tolerance” tack in an attempt to force better parental behaviors. This institutional practice has not worked.
My own experience as a father has
been the ongoing revelation that parenting is very difficult. I quickly discovered that my rules were too
often negotiable when that was not my intent.
I would sometimes fall into the trap that I never challenged my Dad’s
authority, when in fact I constantly searched for ways to do just that. By the time we had our third child, I learned
that they were all quite different. What
worked with one, did not work with the other.
As I got older I became more tired and my will would often succumb to
fatigue.
As a
culture we have done a very poor job supporting parenting. Too often we have treated parenting as
instinct and not modeled practice. The
public schools come out of a bias for academic language and thought. If educators were honest, we would see that
less than half of the high school graduates leave with any sense of educational
fulfillment. They often get through
school in spite of themselves or their families. As we have progressed through the 21st
century, education policy makers have moved further away from the social and
civic experience and more toward the academic.
We in public education develop layers of rules that can only be
navigated by the most prepared and determined of families. When the U.S. adopted an information economy
the families with successful educational legacies were able to change. The families that typically depended on
skilled and unskilled labor, often those who barely made it through high school
or dropped out, began to lose economic ground. The public schools did nothing to help young
adults navigate the challenges of parenting.
We simply blamed single parent families or “the entitlement class.”
Public
schools have always acted as a tool to separate the wheat from the chaff. High school was actually established to weed
out students who were not college material.
As a K-12 education became more important for the citizenry, this model
for high school should have changed. Too
often it has not. The advent of
technology has made it even more difficult for families to infiltrate the
bureaucratic morass that is the institutional model for public schools. School institutions have too often moved to
force digital compliance with no effort to develop the infrastructure and
experience necessary for parents to support their children. Not only have we done a poor job preparing
parents to raise their children, but we have made it more difficult for parents
to get their children to meaningful citizenship.
So, no,
parents are not the reason our public schools struggle. The institutional devaluation of community as
a tool to raise children by governments and bureaucratic entities has made
purposeful child rearing more difficult.
It’s time that we as educators learn to embrace parents and show that we
understand parenting is difficult through initiatives that encourage shared
experience and create a forum of diverse parental experiences. Schools should start offering programs that
support parenting and quit acting as if good parenting is a character trait.
My kids have attended public and private schools in Japan and Singapore both of which score well internationally. In the case of Japanese public schools, the parents are heavily engaged in the whole process inside and outside of school. In the case of Singapore, this engagement is less so but still there; Singapore teachers seem to be accessible many hours beyond class via email and Social media. However, I'm not sure what the lessons are here for the American case.
ReplyDeleteTwo things: In US schools we tend to forget educators are here to serve. Secondly, one common factor for any quality school is community. Contemporary politics in the US tend to minimize community and over value the individual. This isn't a good sign for the public schools.
ReplyDelete